Inspector refuses permission for sale of land in Longhorsley

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
A decision to retain part of Longhorsley village green, which had been earmarked for development, has been welcomed by an environmental pressure group.

Longhorsley Parish Council wanted to sell off around 54 square metres of the verge of East Road, east of the junction with the A697.

The land would have been sold to enable a driveway as part of the redevelopment of adjoining land at Kirkups Corner.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The verge is a remnant of the unenclosed wastes of the village, registered as town or village green by the parish council.

Kirkups Corner in Longhorsley.Kirkups Corner in Longhorsley.
Kirkups Corner in Longhorsley.

In order to dispose of the land free of any constraints, the parish council had to apply to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to deregister the land under section 16 of the Commons Act 2006.

The Open Spaces Society objected to the application, pointing out that it was the secretary of state’s policy published in 2015 to grant such an application, where no other land was offered in substitution, only in exceptional circumstances.

The inspector appointed by the Secretary of State, Ms C Beeby, agreed.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In her decision of October 3, she refused consent, finding: “The absence of replacement land results in a reduction in the verdant and rural appearance of the village as a whole.”

She concludes that: “The secretary of state’s policy is not to allow the stock of common land and village greens to diminish,” and in the absence of a wider public interest and any offer of replacement land, the application by the parish council should be refused.

Speaking for the society, Hugh Craddock, a case officer, said: “This is one of several recent decisions in which inspectors have made clear that the secretary of state’s policy means what it says: even small areas of town or village green should not be deregistered without an offer of replacement land, unless there are truly exceptional circumstances.

"It would save everyone time and expense if applicants accepted that it is the policy, and offered worthwhile replacement land from the off. Until they do, we shall continue to oppose applications which are more about private than public benefit.”